COOKIES USE We use necessary system cookies for the correct functioning of the website and optional Google Analytics cookies to obtain visit statistics. +info
Cookies config
Necessary
The necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to work properly. This category only includes cookies that guarantee basic website security and functionality. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Name
Proveedor
Propiedad
Finalidad
Caducidad
+info
_GRECAPTCHA
google.com
Own
provide antispam protection with the reCaptcha service
6 months
cc_cookie_accept
fidmag.org
Own
Usada per confirmar que l'usuari ha confirmat / refusat les cookies (i quins tipus accepta)
1 any
WEB_SESSION
fidmag.org
Own
Cookie técnica: cookie de sessió PHP. Guarda l'id de sessió d'usuari.
al acabar la sessió
Analisys
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help to provide information on meters, the name of visitors, the percentage of bounces, the font of the traffic, etc.
Name
Proveedor
Propiedad
Finalidad
Caducidad
+info
_ga
Google Analytics
From third parties
Cookie d'anàlisi o mesurament: Identifica els usuaris i proporciona informació sobre com els usuaris troben la pàgina web i com la utilitzen per a realització d'Informes estadístics
2 anys
_gat_gtag_UA_141706552_1
Google Analytics
From third parties
Cookie d'anàlisi o mesurament: Tracking per part de google per google analytics
1 minut
_gid
Google Analytics
From third parties
Cookie d'anàlisi o mesurament: S'usa per limitar el percentatge de sol·licituds
Improving Prognostic Accuracy in Subjects at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: Systematic Review of Predictive Models and Meta-analytical Sequential Testing Simulation.
Schmidt A, Cappucciati M, Radua J, Rutigliano G, Rocchetti M, Dell'Osso L, Politi P, Borgwardt S, Reilly T, Valmaggia L, McGuire P, Fusar-Poli P
Limited service to collaborators of the network of Sisters Hospitalarias Centers. You will receive a message in your email with a link to download this article.
Abstract
Discriminating subjects at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis who will develop psychosis from those who will not is a prerequisite for preventive treatments. However, it is not yet possible to make any personalized prediction of psychosis onset relying only on the initial clinical baseline assessment. Here, we first present a systematic review of prognostic accuracy parameters of predictive modeling studies using clinical, biological, neurocognitive, environmental, and combinations of predictors. In a second step, we performed statistical simulations to test different probabilistic sequential 3-stage testing strategies aimed at improving prognostic accuracy on top of the clinical baseline assessment. The systematic review revealed that the best environmental predictive model yielded a modest positive predictive value (PPV) (63%). Conversely, the best predictive models in other domains (clinical, biological, neurocognitive, and combined models) yielded PPVs of above 82%. Using only data from validated models, 3-stage simulations showed that the highest PPV was achieved by sequentially using a combined (clinical + electroencephalography), then structural magnetic resonance imaging and then a blood markers model. Specifically, PPV was estimated to be 98% (number needed to treat, NNT = 2) for an individual with 3 positive sequential tests, 71%-82% (NNT = 3) with 2 positive tests, 12%-21% (NNT = 11-18) with 1 positive test, and 1% (NNT = 219) for an individual with no positive tests. This work suggests that sequentially testing CHR subjects with predictive models across multiple domains may substantially improve psychosis prediction following the initial CHR assessment. Multistage sequential testing may allow individual risk stratification of CHR individuals and optimize the prediction of psychosis.